### Notepad — blank `index.html` Paste this **entire code block** into the blank file: ```html South Dakota Indigenous Justice Trends | Turquoise Tiospaye

TTO Indigenous Justice Research Center

South Dakota Indigenous Justice Trends

A free public research project examining incarceration, jurisdiction, reentry, prevention, healing, public funding, and community safety across South Dakota.

Purpose

Understanding the systems affecting Indigenous people without defining communities through harm.

This project will examine what public information reveals, what it leaves out, and how incarceration, prevention, reentry, behavioral health, healing, jurisdiction, funding, and community-led solutions shape safety and wellbeing.

Community knowledge comes first.

  • Research will be made freely available for public education.
  • Indigenous people will not be reduced to statistics, deficits, incarceration, or stereotypes.
  • Data limitations, missing records, and conflicting definitions will be clearly identified.
  • The project will examine prevention, healing, cultural connection, reentry, and community strengths—not only harm.
  • Sources and methods will be documented so others can review, question, and build upon the work.

Research questions

What are we trying to understand?

Incarceration

What trends appear in admissions, releases, revocations, sentencing, offense categories, age, gender, and geography?

Jurisdiction

How do tribal, federal, state, county, and municipal systems divide responsibility, information, and accountability?

Reentry

What housing, employment, treatment, mentoring, cultural, and family supports are available after incarceration?

Youth and Prevention

What resources are directed toward diversion, education, early intervention, cultural connection, and family support?

Healing and Safety

Which community-led approaches strengthen accountability, recovery, relationships, stability, and collective wellbeing?

Public Investment

Where is public funding directed, and how much emphasis is placed on incarceration compared with prevention and healing?

Research method

A transparent and repeatable process.

TTO will document how information is gathered, reviewed, categorized, analyzed, and interpreted.

1. Collect

Gather public reports, datasets, policies, budgets, legislation, journalism, program information, and other verifiable sources.

2. Review

Examine each source for relevance, duplication, date, jurisdiction, definitions, completeness, and reliability.

3. Classify

Organize information by topic, population, geography, system, intervention, outcome, and source type.

4. Compare

Identify patterns, changes over time, missing information, inconsistencies, and differences between systems.

5. Interpret

Place findings within the realities of history, jurisdiction, public investment, community strengths, and available supports.

6. Publish

Release findings, charts, source notes, methods, limitations, and practical community-safety recommendations free online.

Potential source areas

Information will be gathered across multiple systems.

Corrections and Courts

Statistical reports, admissions, releases, supervision, sentencing, court activity, and correctional policies.

Tribal and Federal Systems

Tribal justice information, federal Indian Country prosecution materials, jurisdictional policies, and community-response efforts.

Community Programs

Reentry, behavioral health, victim services, youth diversion, cultural programming, workforce development, and healing.

Budgets and Grants

Public budgets, grant awards, funding notices, contracts, program investments, and implementation information.

Legislation and Policy

State and federal legislation, administrative rules, agency policies, planning documents, and public testimony.

Public Reporting

Journalism, public statements, community reports, investigative findings, and documented lived experience.

Data limitations will be part of the findings.

Justice information may be separated across tribal, federal, state, county, and municipal systems. Definitions, reporting practices, time periods, and racial classifications may differ.

TTO will not combine numbers that cannot be responsibly compared. Missing information will be identified openly rather than replaced with unsupported assumptions.

Project status

Building the foundation carefully.

Research framework

Define the research questions, topic categories, source standards, and data-limitation rules.

Source inventory

Identify reliable public datasets, reports, policies, budgets, community programs, and historical materials.

Data review

Clean records, remove duplicates, document exclusions, compare definitions, and verify source relevance.

First public release

Publish the initial South Dakota findings, charts, methodology, limitations, and community recommendations.

Community knowledge

Help identify information that should be examined.

TTO welcomes public reports, datasets, policy documents, program information, corrections, and source recommendations. Submission does not guarantee inclusion, and all information will be reviewed before use.

Share a Source with TTO
```